Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication, Retina and Uvea
Case Report, Cataract
Case Report, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Case Report, Cornea and Refractive
Case Report, Neuroophthalmology
Case Report, Oculoplasty
Case Report, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Case Report, Retina and Uvea
Case Series, Retina and Uvea
Cataract, Photo Essay
Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Cataract
Guest Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Neuro-Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Retina and Uvea
Invited Review, Cataract
Invited Review, Oculoplasty
Original Article, Cataract
Original Article, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Cataract
Photo Essay, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Cornea & Refractive
Photo Essay, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Neuro-ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Photo Essay, Retina and Uvea
Review Article, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Review Article, Cornea and Refractive
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication, Retina and Uvea
Case Report, Cataract
Case Report, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Case Report, Cornea and Refractive
Case Report, Neuroophthalmology
Case Report, Oculoplasty
Case Report, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Case Report, Retina and Uvea
Case Series, Retina and Uvea
Cataract, Photo Essay
Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Cataract
Guest Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Neuro-Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Retina and Uvea
Invited Review, Cataract
Invited Review, Oculoplasty
Original Article, Cataract
Original Article, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Cataract
Photo Essay, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Cornea & Refractive
Photo Essay, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Neuro-ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Photo Essay, Retina and Uvea
Review Article, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Review Article, Cornea and Refractive
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication, Retina and Uvea
Case Report, Cataract
Case Report, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Case Report, Cornea and Refractive
Case Report, Neuroophthalmology
Case Report, Oculoplasty
Case Report, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Case Report, Retina and Uvea
Case Series, Retina and Uvea
Cataract, Photo Essay
Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Cataract
Guest Editorial, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Neuro-Ophthalmology
Guest Editorial, Retina and Uvea
Invited Review, Cataract
Invited Review, Oculoplasty
Original Article, Cataract
Original Article, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Cataract
Photo Essay, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Cornea & Refractive
Photo Essay, Glaucoma
Photo Essay, Neuro-ophthalmology
Photo Essay, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Photo Essay, Retina and Uvea
Review Article, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Review Article, Cornea and Refractive
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
Comprehensive Ophthalmology
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JORP_18_2024

Computer vision syndrome: A disease of the new age era

Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding author: Jeotsna Rajput, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. jeotsnarajput@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Parihar S, Rajput J, Mishra D, Panda DR, Pal K, Shukla E. Computer vision syndrome: A disease of the new age era. J Ophthalmic Res Pract. doi: 10.25259/JORP_18_2024

Abstract

Advancement in technology has revolutionized the modern era, making people turn a blind eye to its disastrous effects. One such harmful effect is the overuse of digital screens for various purposes leading to a new disease entity named “Computer vision syndrome”. Although a major health problem, it is often ignored by the patients and practitioners, particularly in a developing country like India. The purpose of this narrative review article is to shed light on the various symptoms as well as provide a fruitful treatment based on evidence-based literature available.

Keywords

Computer vision syndrome
Dry eye disease
Asthenopia
Eyestrain
Visual fatigue

INTRODUCTION

Computer vision syndrome or visual fatigue or digitalized strain is a pathology of the modern era characterized by the presence of various ocular, musculoskeletal, and behavioral signs and symptoms due to prolonged use of digital screen.[1] It is characterized by range of eye and vision-related symptoms.

Often described as a ‘complex of eye and vision problems related to near work experienced during constant use of computers,[2] the massive emergence of digital age has influenced people of all strata, regardless of age.[1] Emergence of digital gadgets has greatly benefited the society but also exposed us to many health-related issues. According to Anbesu and Lema, the use of devices even for three hours (h) per day can lead to development of computer vision syndrome.[2]

Although an emergency problem, computer vision syndrome is often ignored, particularly in developing countries. It has been seen that engagement with digital devices has increased dramatically in the recent years. A lot many of “recent internet users” (aged 60–70 years) have been added to the list of people relying on digital screen. Furthermore, the younger generation (20–29 years) uses digital gadgets for multitasking and for work purposes.[3]

PAPER SELECTION

We searched for PubMed database to study recent articles on Computer Vision Syndrome in the past five years using keywords Computer Vision Syndrome and digital eye strain. Focus was given to meta-analysis and review articles. Total searched articles were 71 while articles relevant to our scope of research were 14 [Figure 1].

Selection of articles for overview
Figure 1:
Selection of articles for overview

PREVALENCE

Anbesu and Lema conducted a meta-analysis including eight study designs from India which stated that nearly two in three participants have computer vision syndrome.[2] The pooled prevalence of computer vision syndrome in pre-COVID lockdown was 64.3% although it indicated that studies may have exaggerated the true prevalence of computer vision syndrome.[4-9] It is found to be more in females as compared to males.

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

According to the American Optometric Association, the most common symptoms associated with digital eye strain are headache, eyestrain, blurred vision, dry eyes and pain in the neck and shoulders.

A formal term “Asthenopia” was described word for eye strain by Sheedy et al.[10] It stated the external factors to be burning sensation, irritation, dryness, and tearing, whereas the internal factors comprise ache behind eyes, strain, and headache.

The main set of symptoms was identified into two categories: those associated with accommodation (blurred vision) and those linked with dry eye disease.[11]

Dry eye disease

Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal worker was found ranging from 9.5% to 87.5% as compared to general population, which has a prevalence of 5–33.3%.[12] According to Dry Eye Workshop II, the diagnostic methodology for dry eye, the disease includes ocular surface disease index, the TBUT (tear film break up time), osmolarity and ocular surface stain. This standardized criteria points toward higher prevalence of dry eye disease in patients with computer vision syndrome.[13] Also, reduced blinking rates with the use of computers is frequently associated with dry eye disease.[14]

Accomodative effects

Numerous studies have found that prolonged near work during the use of digital screen can lead to decrease in accommodation amplitude, acute acquired comitant esotropia leading to diplopia, high lag in accommodation. Dynamic retinoscopy with patient fixating a near target is used to assess lag of accommodation.[15,16] One hour working time can lead to decreased amplitude of accommodation and retraction of near convergence point.[1]

Change in intraocular pressure

Eun Ji Lee conducted a study on 158 subjects and reported significant elevation of intraocular pressure at 5 minutes (min) after starting the task and intraocular pressure kept increasing until 30 min viewing period.[17]

Environmental factors

They also play an important role. Light coming from a source over the device diminishes the contrast and leads to discomfort.[18] Use of digital screen for more than 4 h per day is a risk factor for dry eye disease and environment of humidity <40% can cause more eye discomfort.[13] Furthermore, the use of nicotine in a competitive work environment acts as a risk factor.[1]

Exposure to blue light

Exposure to 400–500 nanometer (blue light) for longer duration can induce photochemical damage to the macula. These can also cause alteration in physiological functions, alterations in circadian rhythm, and can cause insomnia.[19] This can also affect the sleep quality, thus causing daytime sleepiness and reduces subjective alertness.[20]

Extraocular symptoms

Headaches have been shown to be more common when gadgets are used for a prolonged time.[21] Furthermore, the use of computers causes a constant flexion of neck subsequently leading to back pain, shoulder pain, and neck pain. Wrist, arm, and hands are also affected leading to carpal tunnel syndrome.[22]

MANAGEMENT

Dry eye disease

For the management of dry eye disease, consistent use of lubricating eye drops has been shown to reduce symptoms of dryness.[23] Furthermore, the reduced blink rate, as noticed in patients with computer vision syndrome, can be increased by application of air stream to the face.[14] There is also a positive impact on dry eye disease by closing of eyes for 2 seconds (sec) 2 times in between.[24] Dietary supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids on dry eye symptoms has shown improvement over a period of three months.[25] Meta-analysis has stated that overall berry extracts supplementation did not improve visual fatigue.[26]

Correction of refractive errors and presbyopia

Prolonged viewing of small fonts should be avoided and a minimum viewing distance of 500–635 mm and preferred screen angle of 120–125° horizontally or about 30° below the line of sight is recommended.[27]

Furthermore, the use of computer glasses has been effective in reduction of vision-related symptoms of computer users.[28] Supplementary breaks reliably minimize discomfort without impairing productivity.[29] According to the 20–20–20 rule, every 20 min, one should take the eyes off the screen for 20 sec and focus on an object 20 feet apart.[30]

Exposure to blue light

Van der Lely et al. suggested the role of blue blocker glasses in male adolescents.[20] While exposure to LED screen can attenuate melatonin suppression, use of glasses, thus have beneficial effects on sleep quality, daytime functioning, and mood.

CONCLUSION

In the modern era, the use of digital devices for work and recreation has become a common issue. As already cited in literature, a large proportion of the population are at risk for computer vision syndrome. However, persistent treatment options should be explored to address the issues present with computer vision syndrome.

To provide optimum patient care, every practitioner should be well aware of recent advances pertaining to the condition as it presents with a variety of vague complaints that dramatically affect the quality of life of individuals. To sum up, preventive techniques, patient education, and lifestyle modifications are the best tools to address the condition.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Computer vision syndrome: An ophthalmic pathology of the modern era. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59:412.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1801.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Impact of ophthalmic webinars on the resident's learning experience during COVID-19 pandemic: An insight into its present and future prospects. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:145-50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Computer vision syndrome among individuals using visual display terminals for more than two hours. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2020;21:139-45.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Prevalence and associated risk factors of computer vision syndrome among the computer science students of an engineering college of Bengaluru-a cross-sectional study. Galore Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;4:10-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . A cross sectional study to assess prevalence of computer vision syndrome and vision related problems in computer users. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2016;4:11007-12.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Asthenopia (eyestrain) in working children of gem-polishing industries. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27:243-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of computer vision syndrome and dry eye in computer operators. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res. 2021;59:160-3.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among medical and engineering students in chennai. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4:179-85.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:732-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Computer-related visual symptoms in office workers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32:375-82.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009675.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:539-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:888-92.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Diplopia after excessive smart phone usage. Neuroophthalmology. 2019;43:323-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:540-4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Effect of Smartphone Use on Intraocular Pressure. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18802.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Computer and visual display terminals (VDT) vision syndrome (CVDTS) Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72:270-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Effects of blue light on the circadian system and eye physiology. Mol Vis. 2016;22:61-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Blue blocker glasses as a countermeasure for alerting effects of evening light-emitting diode screen exposure in male teenagers. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:113-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Computer vision syndrome among Saudi population: An evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:2313-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Computer keyboarding biomechanics and acute changes in median nerve indicative of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:546-50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Computer vision syndrome: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:253-62.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Therapeutic benefits of blinking exercises in dry eye disease. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44:101329.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Oral omega-3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:206-10.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Interventions for the management of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:1192-215.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. Appl Ergon. 2007;38:601-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . The efficacy of computer glasses in reduction of computer worker symptoms. Optometry. 2002;73:221-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , . Supplementary breaks and stretching exercises for data entry operators: A follow-up field study. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:519-27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. . Effect of digital device use during COVID-19 on digital eye strain. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104:698-704.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections